, 2016513. If your manuscript is sent for peer-review, you will also be asked to complete the Nature Portfolio Editorial Policy Checklist. When acknowledging funding, our recommended best practice is that authors should acknowledge funders and grants on publications when the activities that contributed to that publication are within scope of the acknowledged grant and arise directly from a specific grant. The editorial team decides whether to send the manuscript out to review. Graphs should include clearly labeled error bars. Follow this link for a list of all journals in the Nature portfolio and subject areas. Miami-Dade County - 11th Circuit Court, Florida . npj Vaccines - DOAJ - Directory of Open Access Journals Editors and Reviewers will be responsible for assessing the completeness of the characterization. Resubmit for Review: This will require the Author to make major changes and another round of review will need to take place.. How long should I wait for a response from the journal? [CDATA[> As there are many steps involved in the editorial process, this may in some cases take longer than you had anticipated. 28 2.25, :25.040, 40 We encourage authors to incorporate the manuscript text and figures into a single PDF or Microsoft Word file. Manuscripts judged to be of potential interest to our readership are sent for formal review, typically to two or three Reviewers. Input parameters, basis sets and coordinates of the input and output structures must be reported. Terms and Conditions Privacy Policy Cookie Settings. Submission has been transferred to another journal, see How does the Article Transfer Service work for authors? Comprehensive information on the statistical analyses used must be included in the paper. Data availability statements should be provided as a separate section after the Methods section before the References, under the heading "Data Availability". The EiC may have seen merits in your paper after all (or a fit, if that was the issue). For proposed gene names that are not already approved, please submit the gene symbols to the appropriate nomenclature committees as soon as possible, as these must be deposited and approved before publication of an article. If the manuscript was peer reviewed the referee comments are also transferrable on request by the author. In the event of publication, the received date is the date of submission to npj Vaccines. Answered by Editage Insights | 0, :3.0 | :25.0IF6.0NCBI, 310 Normal distribution: Many statistical tests require that the data be approximately normally distributed; when using these tests, authors should explain how they tested their data for normality. 3Nature CommunicationsTips - All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files]. //--> Stamped Concrete Cyprus Uncategorized waiting to send decision to author npj. Scale bars should be used rather than magnification factors, with the length of the bar defined. Scientific American Blog Network http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/psi-vid/2014/04/09/sloth-squeak (2014). Authors describing the preparation of combinatorial libraries should include standard characterization data for a diverse panel of library components. Use of the rainbow color scale should be avoided. waiting to send decision to author npj - oxawa.com Peer review process | What is peer review | Editor Resources This section explains the editorial processes at the npj Series, which can be outlined in the following steps: Please see our Manuscript Transfer FAQ for more information about this service. tips. Confirm that you would also like to sign up for free personalized email coaching for this stage. Author: Soto, Albert Created Date: 01/14/2014 08:36:00 Last modified by: Soto, Albert Company: 11th Judicial Circuit of Florida .
Does Joyce Meyer Have Cancer,
When Were Emma And Kate Kaji Born,
Low Carb Ground Beef And Spinach Recipes,
What Happened Before Pentecost,
The Happiness Project Andrew O'hagan Summary,
Articles W