While most of the documentaries come out as reinforcing her guilt, albeit most of them giving differing accounts of the speculation which was presented at her trial, some going even further by showing scenes that were offered as theories at her trial, as FACT. See Commonwealth v. Rorrer, CP-39- CR-0002176-1997 (C.C.P. If you want to help her tell her to ask God for forgiveness. For this week, I looked into the defenders reasoning as well as Patricias whereabouts today. We lived close to one another. The criminal, a crazy with a psychotic crush on a man, the planner a individual with a lot of self esteem and narcissistic charm who can persuade women, was rich thought compared to the individual in this case, and the victim, a woman who saw her life only as a wife and mother and had no other pretensions, and that even if she had threatened the individual that she would leave a few times, she always stayed. Watch Wrong Man Season 2: Stream Full Episodes on STARZ OK my GUESS is Patricia did do it! I fail to see exactly why someone cant have an opinion which he/she sees as fact. Clifford Freeman, were you a juror? Answer 1 of 2: We are looking to get the ferry over to Helsinki from Tallin on 27th Dec 2020, so trying to establish if best to get an early (7am) ferry or a slightly later one depending on what time the shops/sight seeing attractions will be open - can anyone. A man normally wouldnt care about killing a child, but a woman normally would have some kind of abhorrence to harming an innocent child. Prosecution leader McIntyre, when interviewed, laughingly dismissed him as a nut in an effort to trivialise Traupmans input. If Patricia drove it back from the murder scene after she shot Joann and then beat her to death, luminal would have lit up the interior. But defense lawyer Robert Pfeiffer said that plenty of evidence supported Patricias innocence. Unbloody vehicle. Commonwealth v. Rorrer | J-S71013-19 | Pa. Super. Ct. | Judgment | Law Nope. Its nine minutes into the video. This article is little more than fiction. You are not expressing an opinion but making an assertion or claim of fact: [I] have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. You are claiming innocence as fact there is no doubt shes innocent. I didnt read anything in this article that convinced me I didnt like that the lab had a bad rep and I do agree the police lie and frame people sometimes so I cant say 100% she did it or not. On Alexs diaper bag, police found strands of the same type of hair from the car. Walmart woe. Theyre more than happy to exaggerate and speculate the details of the crime, which serves to attract more viewers who (like you) seem to be happy to believe it all. And this doesnt apply to your opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. They dont need to make money??? THE COPS SET HER UP. Have you read the book? If Patricia had injuries it wouldve only been to her hands and she wasnt questioned right away which is also the reason she took Joanne elsewhere to kill her so her body wouldnt be found for a while and she would have time to return home. Killers can plan all the details and alibis well ahead of the murder while cops must come up with hard evidence, even just to make an arrest. She never had anyone testify against her but an ex-boyfriend! Patricia and her husband broke up after the babys death. It then makes light of the fact that the car in which the (incriminating) hairs were found was absent of any blood. There was a blood-stained fingernail and hair found on the victims body, and even though (in Keith Morrisons Dateline documentary) the Asst. Why would it be an irony for a person to express his opinion? because theres money to be made from the commercials added into their show. Vonda Smith: An Unexpected Twist . I attack only those whove considered themselves not only judges on this case, but go on to vent their spleen aimed at a person who in my opinion is innocent of this crime, based on all Ive read and watched without fear of retaliation If they so freely attack someone in the most vicious way, why should they be off limits? One more thing acquire ALL the facts about this case If you can read. Rorrer and Katrinak broke up in 1989 five years before the murders and Andy married Joann in May, 1993 after dating for approximately one year. Thats all for this post. Sad discovery. Trash-talking ex. Lawyer: New evidence in 1994 killings of woman, infant Beautifully said Cliff! Youre clutching at straws Im afraid. Stop trying to prove that everyone who is prosecuted is rightfully prosecuted. On January 11, 2021, I expect she will admit it one day. Not gender neutral. If you can tear yourself away from your obsessive mentality, you can see what virtually amounts to the tampering to which I referred. He would be alive today if it were not for Patricia Rorrer. The mild-mannered Sarah died in 2019 at the age of 83. Why is this even a question, why people are trying to take out killers into society? They moved into her house in Salisbury County, staying together for about two years. It has very bad energy. On a secret recording, Patricia asked Jarrett to vouch for her attendance or she might go to the electric char. They found several specimens but not a single one was a match. I noticed quite a few errors myself. Did he go on to have any other children is later relationship(s), do we know? You, however seem to have no problem with these hurtful and damaging comments aimed at Rorrer. Your email address will not be published. I dont even know its Christmas.. So where they alive somewhere, and if so how could of Patricia, who was questioned, with not one mark on her kill them? This article seems to have a great many errors and omissions, more by design, I fancy, than a need to tell the story objectively. Its an opinion learnt from a well-researched book, from documentaries which show and mention a great deal of facts and evidence which was never brought up at her trial. There are judges, eminent lawyers and writers who are in support of her. Ive followed and made a study of this case for more than twenty years and have absolutely no doubt she was railroaded and wrongfully convicted. Other loyal friends and associates attested to Patricias kindness toward horses and devotion to her daughter, whom she took along as she worked in stables. Thank you and well said. I thought the justice system in my state and the people were narrow-minded and corrupt. Miami Herald Article on Bobby Kent's Murder - Forensic Files Now She only spoke on the phone with him a couple of times a year; when she called that last time, she didnt even know if Andys child was a boy or a girl, and the baby was almost 4 months old. Patricia defaulted on her mortgage and then returned to North Carolina, where she eventually moved in with a boyfriend named Brian Ward. Patricias professional life included short-lived gigs as a Century 21 real estate agent and an Oldsmobile salesperson. They were able to match 5 hairs all the same micro DNA which happened to match the DNA pulled from blood samples Pat gave. This woman was motivated by an obsession with a man who no longer wanted her. Lets stop pretending we can definitively prove this woman murdered this woman and her child. At 17, Patricia dropped out of high school and married landscaper Gary Gabard. Several instances of malpractice, along with revelations have emerged since her incarceration namely, failing to forensically examine significant items of evidence items which would have seriously compromised their case had they been examined and failing to advise Rorrers Defence of witnesses who were prepared to testify on her behalf. On December 12, 1994, Joann answered a phone call from a woman shed never met, Patricia Rorrer, her husbands onetime girlfriend. She hasnt, she didnt get a hard enough sentence. She made Joanne kill the baby PLEASE. Joanne didnt go missing until December 15, an entire week and a day later. Which, for this very reason, is at present being investigated by a federal judge? Under supervision of a doctor, 39 hair specimens were removed, recorded and logged. Three days later, Joann had plans to pick up her mother-in-law, Veronica Katrinak, to go Christmas shopping. Did Patricia have the dyed blond hair when they broke up in 1993? I have worked for Interpol for years as a gun analyst, usually women who commit such crimes against their exes wife or mistress, lover etc are pushed from behind by a man and promises and lies. COVID in Tight Spaces: How an Incarcerated Woman Used Writing to Cope You can PM me please, this way you can update your article with the correct information. Anyone who thinks this psycho isnt guilty needs to take off their tin hat. Thats my life.. Please read her story. Joann Katrinaks Killer Still Has Innocence Advocates(A Woman Scorned, Forensic Files). I happen to be one of those deluded people youre so freely attempting to insult. The state police dropped him as a suspect. If not, how could Andrew have obtained samples of Patricias hair if they apparently didnt meet up in person after Andrews marriage? After an hour Id call anyone whod listen to me including police! Police slowly built a case against Patricia. The Irish-Italian girl had full, fluffy dark hair, olive skin, and a pretty face. February 8, 2020. All the sources said the same thing either exposure or suffocation, but no certainty about which one. Rather, Im conservative when it comes to potential disagreement with the jury: I wasnt there to see/hear evidence and to declare theyre wrong! Prime Video: Wrong Man - Season 2 But hang on You ask that I show care with my wording and show all the tolerance in the world, and by that you presumably mean I should simply ignore those who villify her in the most disgraceful way, probably in the opinion that all readers of their comments will agree, and no one is going to take offence! What a lame article. For one thing, her mother never asked Sandra Ireland to hide the gun, and she retrieved it on the way home the next day she worked as a bus driver and couldnt take it with her to school. Have you watched any of the documentaries Ive mentioned? She had a suitcase packed, Devine said. Most damning of all the evidence is the hair which was DNA matched to Rorrer which was instrumental in her conviction. Microconidia DNA, as long as the strand is one inch long they can pull the DNA from that. And the obvious answer is that the makers too think the evidence is against her. False. The reason Interpol was involved is because all three had different European citizens, as a result of which it was very difficult to follow the thread of the event. The FBI even included a written report to that effect. But unfortunately other than God only two people know exactly what really happened and one is not alive. Book her. No show. Ep 205 - Clair Hour 1: Black or White TV-MA | 53 MINS | 2020 The missing hairs probably got destroyed in testing.. thats how they test them.. and reports are wrong all the time. Clifford: I cant offer anything remotely novel or incisive. Youre so fixated with her guilt, youre unable to see other factors that show this case to be a disgraceful travesty.
Pawtree Wild Alaskan Salmon Pollock Oil,
Sirius Goes Back In Time To Save Regulus Fanfiction,
Tractor Supply Welding Helmet,
Articles P