0000073715 00000 n A further consideration was that the ULFI has a single factor structure [25] and an acceptable level of internal consistency in all studies. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric properties of Urdu version of upper limb functional index; a validity and reliability study. 0000071853 00000 n The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the Google Scholar, Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA: Psychometric properties of the shortene disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. Before Below are the links to the authors original submitted files for images. In the same study, the longitudinal validity coefficient between the UEFI and the UEFS was 0.74. The 15-item LEFS-Ar demonstrated evidence supporting its internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity as a measure of lower extremity function in Arabic-speaking patients with lower extremity musculoskeletal disorders. 0000084264 00000 n Disclaimer. The procedure of cross-cultural adaptation of a scale has been used in previous studies for different scales to be applied in the Spanish context [43, 44] The Upper Limb Functional Index: Development and Determination of Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness. Jill M. Binkley, Paul Stratford, Stephanie Kirkpatrick,Clara R. Farley, Joel Okoli, Sheryl Gabram Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. Flowchart of the translation of the Upper Limb Functional Index (ULFI) from English to Spanish. The ULFI-Sp demonstrated high internal consistency ( = 0.94) and reliability (r = 0.93). IJERPH | Free Full-Text | The Upper Extremity Functional Index - MDPI 0000153760 00000 n 2022 Sep 6;19(18):11203. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191811203. Traditionally, clinical signs and symptoms were used as outcomes and studies that wished to reflect patient health status employed generic quality of life measures. 0000095718 00000 n A two stage observational study was conducted. 0000156160 00000 n The UEFI has 20 upper extremity-related activities covering house-related, work-related, recreational, and sport-related activities. 01. Treatment Related Impairments in Arm and Shoulder in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review. A physical therapy outpatients population was used for evaluation of the ULFI-Sps four critical psychometric properties. Draw your signature, type it, upload its image, or use your mobile device as a signature pad. 0000122698 00000 n Implementation of a Standard Care Program of Therapeutic Exercise in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients. ; Okoli, J.; Gabram, S. Estimating the Reliability and Validity of the Upper Extremity Functional Index in Women After Breast Cancer Surgery. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012, Lehman LA, Woodbury M, Velozo CA: Examination of the factor structure of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. 0000097773 00000 n MDC values were 9.4/80 for the UEFI-20 and 8.8/100 for the UEFI-15. ^o_on/* G jTIr.1Urc~cz"SJ v8;' g /TF!o-+zlTuRYf.~?E=. Epub 2012 Aug 30. The ULFI is a 25-item 3-point response option PRO that is scored by simple addition of the responses then converted to a 100 point percentage scale. Hu, L.; Bentler, P.M. ; Beurskens, C.H.G. Implications for rehabilitation; The Extremity Function Index reflects the functioning of all muscles in the upper and lower extremities involved in activities of daily living. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): Progress of an NIH Roadmap Cooperative Group during Its First Two Years. Clinical data were collected on the years since diagnosis, type of surgical intervention (breast-conserving or mastectomy), type of adjuvant treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy, or monoclonal antibody), and current treatment (none, radiotherapy, monoclonal antibody, or hormone therapy). Scree Plot of the exploratory one-factor solution. 0000076764 00000 n 0000088903 00000 n The QuickDASH, as derived from 11extracted DASH items, has also been challenged. -, Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, Gershon R, Cook K, Reeve B, Ader D, Fries JF, Bruce B, Rose M. PROMIS Cooperative Group. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Today, do you or would you have any difficulty at all with: Upper Extremity Functional Scale . Reliability for the UEFI-20 and UEFI-15 was the same (ICC=0.94 for both measures). A descriptive statistic of the participants was made with a mean and standard deviation of the demographic variables. The inability to use the QuickDASH-Sp data collected in the clinical setting due to excessive missing responses, potentially from patient burden due to being the final questionnaire, resulted in no direct comparison with a regional upper limb criterion, a requirement for future studies. This study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the Upper Limb Functional Index Spanish version (ULFI-Sp) in the BCS. ; Bombardier, C. Development of an Upper Extremity Outcome Measure: The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) [Corrected]. 10.1016/j.jht.2009.09.007, Michener LA, Leggins BG: A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. 0000073196 00000 n upper extremity functional index calculator Results: A potential source of bias was that the scales were provided always in the same order. Student's t-test will be developed to check the items behave the same way for men and women. Gabel, C.P. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. Gencay Can, A.; Can, S.S.; Ekiolu, E.; akc, F.A. government site. Upper Limb Disorders (ULDs) are highly prevalent even years after a diagnosis. ; Marshall, P.W.M. Longitudinal Change of Treatment-Related Upper Limb Dysfunction and Its Impact on Late Dysfunction in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study. https://www.physio-pedia.com/index.php?title=Upper_Extremity_Functional_Index&oldid=259397, Any of your usual work, housework, or school activities, Your usual hobbies, recreational or sporting activities, Lifting a bag of groceries to waist level, Lifting a bag of groceries above your head, Pushing up on your hands (eg, from bathtub or chair), Laundering clothes (eg, washing, ironing, folding), Carrying a small suitcase with your affected limb. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. The upper limb functional index is broadly used outcome measure for musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Measurement error was determined from SEM and MDC90 being respectively at 3.52% and 8.03%. A Prospective Study. 8600 Rockville Pike (PDF) Upper Extremity Functional Index - ResearchGate Rsultats : La fiabilit des questionnaires IFMS-20 et IFMS-15 a t la mme (CCI=0,94 pour les deux mesures). Consequently, this study shows that the ULFI-Sp will be of value in the assessments of patients with upper limb disorders in clinical and research settings. qw7dNKN}@"z`T|^$-E-qXsV\|e6E&%X]=8\EN@LqS;2r>/Q)esC7w+t#?r8YxqL,L'3'7_3f5b&@n]YE+J_KI"t96NE}e ~>|O2*M&oRo|U9]'' %? It is critical to employ research measures that are valid and reliable but they must also be both culturally and linguistically appropriate. Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Gautheron V, Mac Y, Fermanian J, Mayoux Benhamou A, Roren A, Rannou F, Roby-Brami A, Revel M, Poiraudeau S: Reliability, validity and responsiveness of the French version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand in shoulder disorders. Mthodes : Les adultes ayant une dysfonction des membres suprieurs (MS) ont rpondu au questionnaire IFMS-20, aux questionnaires de l'chelle fonctionnelle des membres suprieurs (EFMS), de l'chelle de limitation de la douleur et de l'chelle de l'intensit de la douleur au cours de leurs premires valuations en physiothrapie (moment 1); de 24 48 heures plus tard (moment 2) et 3 semaines aprs le dbut du traitement ou le cong, selon l'chance la plus rapproche (moment 3). 0000075574 00000 n Phys Ther 2012,92(1):98110. Field A: Discovering Statistics using SPSS. Cookies policy. Available online: Sagen, A.; Kaaresen, R.; Sandvik, L.; Thune, I.; Risberg, M.A. 0000078184 00000 n The test-retest reliability was high at (r=0.93) with an individual range of 0.92 to 0.95. 0000153714 00000 n 0000109694 00000 n Possible range on the UEFI 20-item from 0 80 with 0 indicating lowest functional status and 80 indicating highest functional status. 0000075496 00000 n Value Health 2004, 7: 48. Furthermore, as a new short version was developed, future studies should also address the correlation between the ULFI-Sp short version and different reduced versions of questionnaires, such as the QuickDASH or QuickDASH-9, in the BCS population. 0000158338 00000 n %PDF-1.4 % The determined values were satisfactory and supportive of the findings of the ULFI as a 3-point scale, particularly in the areas of internal consistency, factor structure and reliability. Williams, A.E. The Pearsons r correlation coefficient used the criteria of poor (r<0.49), fair (r=0.50-0.74) and strong (r>0.75) [46]. National Library of Medicine The exclusion criteria were under 18 years old and low reading comprehension due to completing the questionnaire. ; Hutchings, H.A. Stroke Impact Scale | RehabMeasures Database - Shirley Ryan AbilityLab The determination of construct validity through the use of factor analysis represents only one possible statistical method of testing. A KayserMeyerOlkin (KMO) Measure of Sampling Adequacy (>0.70) [, Construct validity and factor structure were determined through the use of Maximum Likelihood Extraction (MLE), with the requirements for extraction being the satisfaction of all three points: scree plot inflexion point, Eigenvalue > 1.0, and accounting for > 10% of the variance [, ULFI internal consistency was evaluated by Cronbachs coefficients calculated at an anticipated value range of 0.800.95 [, Correlation between items and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was made to test whether measures of a construct are consistent with this constructs nature. x]#+1vD7,1=r5^XJS/~`lc EY"/{pIQ$Da;U^Y|QTVMWM]_+^U>w?)Qn+W U>zM[ r^Of] DUU,#vasW8`5Z9wvU7]]Uir_ 7%[ucqsnWcyUN&w6 z56}=+J'[7*teJNP#k$ o{}_7N,qir/\Z,o~/wBrp+'M$ F,U/tkZzE x/x =_R&V${1_7E] ulv.Q\#g+xf, ,fVcUf17pfW{,:oWx?\:U/ Google Scholar, Smith MV, Calfee RP, Baumgarten KM, Brophy RH, Wright RWJ: Upper extremity-specific measures of disability and outcomes in orthopaedic surgery. The Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI) is a 20-item, region-specific PROM initially designed to assess upper extremity function in people with musculoskeletal disorders (17, 18).
Chattanooga Police Department Email,
Adding Food Coloring To Yellow Cake Mix,
Survey Tripod Replacement Parts,
Parle Productions Jack And Kelly Break Up,
Articles U