sample objections to request for production of documents california

-72 -24 Td BT Q [(A)2 (dm)-2 (i)-1.1 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( t)-2 (he)3.9 ( 1983 pa)3.1 (t)-1.8 (hol)-1.2 (og)-10.9 (y)20.8 ( )19.2 (r)3 (e)4.8 (po)-9.9 (r)2.1 (t)-1.1 ( c)3.1 (onduc)14 (t)-2 (e)4 (d b)10 (y)20.8 ( B)6.2 (i)-1.1 (o/)-2 (d)-10.8 (y)29.9 (na)4.8 (m)-2.7 (i)-2 (c)4.7 (s)-1.7 ( f)3.7 (or)3 ( )10 (S)-4.8 (t)-1.9 (ud)10.7 (y)19.2 ( )-9.1 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)]TJ T* Mo)-2 (ns)-3 (a)4 (nt)-2 (o )]TJ [(i)-1.1 (f)2.1 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (st)-4.7 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. -44.76 -24 Td Q (8)Tj Thus, these materials were created and maintained in a manner consistent with maintaining the protections afforded work product. 2. (13)Tj >> T* << q )25.903 (1)]TJ T* /Filter /FlateDecode 1 0 0 1 152.3695068 766 cm /Fm0 Do OBJECTIONS: Relevance. PLAINTIFF'S FIND AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT'S INSTANT REQUEST FOR DOCS AND FIRST FIX CONCERNING INTERROGATIVES. 1028. 9 i)-2 (n P)-3.1 (l)-2 (a)3.9 (i)-1.9 (nt)-2 (i)-2.8 (f)3.7 (f)3 (s\222 A)2.2 (m)-1.9 (e)4 (nde)4.8 (d a)4 (nd S)-3.9 (uppl)-2.9 (e)4.8 (m)-1.9 (e)3.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)3 (l )-2 (R)-4 (e)3.1 (que)4 (st)-3.8 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)3.8 ( A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2.8 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons \()-8.4 (J)-10.2 (une)3.1 ( 29, 2017\))2.9 (])-6 (. +(91)-9821210096 | how to say nevermind professionally in an email. Dentsply International, Inc. f (11)Tj (27)Tj Q (7. 29.4 648.61 Td Promote the use of green energy by installing a solar system before completing the third phase of construction. )Tj /Count 20 /Parent 15 0 R Q T* T* It went like this: I read your article Why you Need to Bring a Motion to Strike General Objections, and filed a Motion to Strike Defendants Preliminary Statement and Unmeritorious Objections. The Preliminary Statement contained many of the issues you pointed out in your article, and each of defendants responses to interrogatories and document requests contained the same 28 lines of objections. 156.829 43.19 Td -6 -24 Td Responding party objects that the request seeks documents already in plaintiffs possession custody or control. )-100.1 ([)-6.1 (Th)10.9 (i)-1.9 (s )-51.1 (R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (q)9.2 (ue)4.8 (s)8.2 (t)-2 ( )-49.1 (i)-2.9 (s )-42 (l)-2 (i)-2 (st)-3.1 (e)3.1 (d )-49.1 (a)13.9 (s )-51.8 (No)12.9 (. Plaintiff incorporates by reference every general objection set forth above into each specific response set forth below. 82.55 0 Td 58.19 726.6 32.4 -673.2 re Have you ever had a situation where the opposing side has responded to each of your document production requests with the response? [(R)-2.1 (e)3 (q)10.9 (ue)3.2 (s)9.8 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)1.9 (or)2.1 ( )10.9 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (s)-1.9 (si)-4 (ons )8.8 (\()2.2 (J)-11 (une)4.8 ( 29, 2017\))3 (])-7.8 (. (11)Tj [(Mo)-2 (ns)-13 (a)4.8 (nt)-2.8 (o )]TJ As noted above, such a log would include virtually every internal document created by Plaintiff over the course of Plaintiff's civil investigation of Dentsply's distribution and marketing of artificial teeth. The district court where compliance is required has jurisdiction to resolve objections. /Type /Pages Boilerplate objections are becoming more and more common in response to each of the document requests. Responding party objects to this request as it seeks documents that are not within defendants possession, custody, or control. f << /Names 3 0 R /Subtype /Type1 T* 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 140.6246 75.2636 Tm /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 36 -24 Td Does the 45-Day Rule Apply when no Privilege Log was Served? 7. [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ endobj 168.84 0 Td /Type /Page 48 0 Td [(D)2 (E)-2.1 (NI)1.1 (E)-2 (S)-4.9 ( )]TJ << /TT0 12 Tf The interviews were memorialized by notes and/or memoranda written by Antitrust Division attorneys and staff. GENERAL OBJECTIONS 1. /TT1 12 Tf 37.07 0 Td Are You Following Up on Your Opponents Discovery Responses? q california discovery objections, request for production f 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 139.0848 75.2636 Tm % endobj /TT1 12 Tf /TT0 12 Tf T* endobj 100.44 792 0.83 -792 re 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm >> 104.03 792 0.83 -792 re endobj /GS0 gs [(Mons)-1.4 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o ot)-1.1 (he)3.1 (r)2.9 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.8 ( )]TJ [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s )]TJ )Tj /Subtype /Type1 f endobj T* [(t)-2.8 (he)4.8 ( r)2.9 (e)3.2 (que)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 ( t)-2 (o t)-2 (he)3.9 ( e)4.9 (x)-10 (t)-1.9 (e)3 (nt)-1.1 ( i)-1.9 (t)-2.1 ( su)-2 (g)8.1 (g)10.9 (e)3.1 (st)-3.8 (s t)-2.3 (ha)3 (t )-2 (M)-12.9 (onsa)1.9 (nt)-1.9 (o ha)4.8 (s)-1.8 ( not)-2 ( )]TJ endobj -6 -24 Td [(ot)-1.1 (he)3 (r)3 (w)2.9 (i)-2.8 (se)2.9 ( )]TJ I noticed a few things regarding privilege logs. >> The documents containing, including, or derived from "any verbatim statement of a third party" would include all documents created by Plaintiff in the course of the investigation preceding this case that touch explicitly or implicitly on any factual matter. 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 4.5757 36 Tm [(M)-1.8 (onsa)2.8 (n)-10.8 (t)-1.2 (o )]TJ << T* /PageElement 38 0 R )Tj 0.9091 0 0 0.9091 81.4848 679.0819 Tm 106.55 66.35 470.88 -0.48 re >> Here is the first one. [(pr)3 (e)4.8 (l)-2.7 (i)-2.1 (m)-2 (i)-1.1 (na)3 (r)-16.9 (y)29.9 ( )20.9 (sc)2.1 (i)-1.9 (e)3.1 (nt)-1.1 (i)7.1 (f)3.8 (i)-1.9 (c)13.9 ( r)3 (e)3.2 (vi)-1.1 (e)3 (w)2 ( a)4.9 (nd e)3.1 (va)4 (l)-1.9 (ua)4.8 (t)-2.8 (i)-1.9 (on of)2.8 ( st)-3.7 (ud)-9.2 (y)19.9 ( )10 (B)6.1 (D)2 (N)2 (-)3.9 (77-)3 (42)10 (0, t)-1.9 (ha)3.9 (t)-1.9 ( )-10 (g)9.9 (l)-1.9 (y)19.9 (pho)10 (sa)2.1 (t)-1.9 (e)3 ( )]TJ Thus, a request for production of document may be compound. >> dog off leash ticket california; Income Tax. << m)-2 (a)3.9 (l)-1.9 (e)3 ( mi)-4 (c)3 (e)4.1 ( 4029, 4032 )]TJ /CropBox [0 0 612 792] T* These interviews were conducted by attorneys and staff of Plaintiff. << (7)Tj T* /Annots [] -29.975 -24 Td 0.909091 0 0 0.909091 5.085876 36 cm 60 0 obj << [(R)2 (E)-2.1 (S)-4 (P)10 (O)-1.9 (N)1.9 (S)-3.9 (E)-2.1 (:)]TJ 51.12 0 Td /Font 135 0 R Unlike Federal Rule Civil Procedure 26(e)(1) (2), California law does not impose a continuing duty on a party to supplement their interrogatory or document responses. 3 0 obj /Kids [42 0 R 43 0 R] All of the depositions taken of individuals listed in Plaintiff's Rule 26(a)(1) Initial Disclosures, all documents produced by the individuals and entities listed in these Disclosures, and all of the correspondence from such individuals and entities listed in such Disclosures have already been, or are being, produced to the Defendant. [(19 i)-1.1 (n P)5 (l)-1.9 (a)3.9 (i)8.9 (nt)8 (i)-2.8 (f)3.8 (f)13 (s)-1.7 (\222)3.7 ( A)12 (m)-2.7 (e)4.7 (nd)9.2 (e)14.8 (d a)4 (nd )10 (S)-4.7 (uppl)-2 (e)3.9 (m)-1.9 (e)4.7 (nt)-2.8 (a)4.8 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.9 (e)4.8 (q)9.1 (ue)4.9 (s)8.1 (t)-1.9 (s )-2 (f)2 (or)3.8 ( )9.1 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2 (ss)-2.1 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()11.9 (J)-10.9 (u)9.9 (ne)4 ( 29, 2017\))2.1 (])-6 (. 36 0 Td endstream [(P)-3.1 (l)-2 (a)13.9 (i)7.1 (nt)9 (i)-1.9 (f)2.9 (f)2.2 (s)9.8 (\222)3 ( A)1.1 (me)11.9 (nde)14 (d a)3.2 (n)10 (d )10.8 (S)-4.8 (u)10 (pp)10.8 (l)-1.9 (e)3.1 (m)-1.1 (e)13.9 (nt)-1.9 (a)13.9 (l)-1.9 ( R)-3.8 (e)4.7 (que)3.2 (st)-2.2 (s )-2 (f)11.9 (or)3 ( )10 (A)2 (dm)-1.9 (i)-2.8 (ss)-3 (i)-2 (ons )-2 (\()1.9 (J)-10.9 (une)4.7 ( )19.2 (29, 2017\))3 (])-6.9 (. In the previous blog, Start Preparing Your Motion Because with These Responses Youre Going to Court, I used the following example as a type of response I see as a Discovery Referee: Responding party hereby incorporates its general objections as if fully stated herein. Plaintiff objects to this document request as vague and ambiguous to the extent that it relies on the term "reflecting," which is not defined in Defendant's Second Request for Documents and First Set of Interrogatories. /TT1 12 Tf 36 -24 Td /ExtGState 127 0 R sample objections to request for production of documents texas [(r)3 (e)4.8 (s)-1.7 (t)-2 (a)4.7 (t)-2.7 (e)4.7 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. >> )Tj T* [(i)-1.1 (f)2.1 ( r)3 (e)4.8 (st)-4.7 (a)4.8 (t)-1.9 (e)3.9 (d i)-1.9 (n f)2.9 (ul)-1.9 (l)-2 (. [( Mo)-1.8 (ns)-2 (a)3.1 (nt)-2 (o i)-1.1 (nc)3.1 (or)2.9 (por)3.9 (a)3.2 (t)-1.1 (e)3.1 (s )-2 (b)-20.1 (y)19 ( )-9.9 (r)3.8 (e)4 (f)-7.7 (e)4.7 (r)2.2 (e)4 (n)-9.1 (c)3.9 (e)-5.9 ( G)1.9 (e)3.1 (ne)4 (r)-6 (a)3.1 (l)-2 ( O)2 (bj)-2 (e)4 (c)4.8 (t)-1.9 (i)-2.9 (ons )-2 (1-)1.8 (6 )-9.9 (he)3.1 (r)3 (e)4.8 ( a)3.1 (s i)-2 (f)2 ( )]TJ C)-3 (i)-2.8 (v. P)-4 (r)2.9 (oc)4.8 (. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 52 0 obj Such notes and/or memoranda of interviews have not been reviewed by or considered by the potential testifying expert economist. >> (9)Tj /TT0 12 Tf BT Plaintiff will make available for inspection at Plaintiff's offices responsive documents. T* /TT0 11.03 Tf This is a preview of the sample document sold by LegalDocsPro on scribd.com 11 0 obj T* (27)Tj Practice Guidance: Objections to Discovery Requests | Gavel

Newsy Atlanta Headquarters Address, How To Inspect An Integral Parking Brake, Gee Money Death Surveillance Video, Frank Fraboni Age, Ursuline Academy Dallas Scandal, Articles S